Addressing A Few Misconceptions Because Of A Tweet or “TwXxt”

Bryan Mullins The Fox
3 min readOct 17, 2023

Instead of “having” to defend myself against an accusation that I specifically do not need to address in a video, there will only be misconceptions surrounding the vast majority of furries, that I will address in a Medium article. I’m not going to ignite or reignite any drama with this or at least it should come off as if I’m clearly not doing that. I’m clearly not, never have been, and never will be a zoophile or zoosadist (that’s something I will reassure).

Now, on with our presentation.

I have to do this only because of this tweet…yep, let it sink in.

There are only a few things I will address (not about the tweet though).

1. Attaching the sick and beyond depraved environment and people that ARE zoophiles and zoosadists, is not and never will be how you address any community properly. It’s not just logically fallacious, but also extremely rude. The vast majority of furries who clearly were never involved in any of that behavior to begin with, don’t need to be roped and dragged into this mess. And yes, raping a child is far worse than raping an animal…let’s be 100% honest and fair here.

The fallacy this problem is riddled with, is guilt by association (one of, or if not the most commonly used variant of the Ad Hominem fallacy).

That’s exactly like saying that somebody that’s a you-know-what ends up having been friends with a particularly shitty you-know-who, attack his critics; then Streisand's the hell out of his history that shows him to be guilty, addressing the predator hunter community by saying the following:

“Since you are a predator hunter, you must be a pedophile or a predator yourself.”

Now, let’s change that sentence up to prove the point of this complaint.

“Since you are a furry, you must be a zoophile or zoosadist yourself.”

Whether they are or not should not be relevant in any conversation, no matter if it’s true or false.

2. Gaslighting other furries, manipulating them into believing, and harassing them off the internet while falsely labeling a random innocent furry a “zoo” in any context is not the proper way to address a growing issue in that community. In fact, it does the exact opposite of it’s intended result. It would only work in a sick and twisted society where in the eyes of the law and all the people who abide by them, zoosadism is worse than child rape…which is not and never will be the case in reality. Ironically, some murderers get a much lower sentence than they should get and some actual animal fuckers don’t get any jail or prison time at all. But that’s because our justice system is corrupt and inexcusably broken most times.

3. I don’t have to defend myself or waste breath addressing obviously false allegations.

And there you have it, I do not know what will happen in the future…but in the meantime, have a good day!

--

--

Bryan Mullins The Fox
0 Followers

A furry on the internet who has built a name for himself by any means necessary.