The Post-Roast-Game Theory Culture Shock Plot Hole Argument

Here is the first out of many arguments in favor of proving The Post-Roast-Game Theory, called the “The Post-Roast-Game Theory Culture Shock Plot Hole Argument.”

Let’s look at this in a statistically analytical lens:

A. Culture Shock is the reason we don’t have Christmas Dinner Consumption Statistics during or even after The Roast Game Era, not necessarily the cause. Because outside of this, there is no excuse that would ever have enough of an effect to affect any other holiday, take for example Thanksgiving.

B. There is no reason why any statistician to fuck up or completely omit data that would exist, had it not fail to fully check out on the spot.

C. The absence of Christmas Dinner data isn’t just absence of evidence, it’s evidence of absence. Meaning that had families not lied about what they ate as the centerpiece of Christmas Dinner, lying and wooing these surveyors and statisticians in general would’ve had nowhere near the effect that it does now, let alone no effect at all.

D. To add insult to injury, completely ditching ham and turkey in the process while wasting them at a whim, makes Christmas Dinner during The Roast Game Era seem as if the Ham-or-Turkey tradition is just a sham. No fully or truly established tradition is no tradition at all.

E. This isn’t just some statistical plot hole, but a plot hole in the history of Christmas Dinner in America and Canada. Plot holes objectively matter when it comes to consistency or to at least point to what they actually ate for Christmas Dinner before.

F. American articles using British Christmas Dinner Data/Statistics/Surveys as if they were from America, and not the U.K. (Which is not just extremely problematic, but monumentally suspect).

G. Taste And Flavor can be objectively measured, but Christmas doesn’t taste like Thanksgiving at all (it should because Turkey and Ham share the same flavor compounds as one another).

H. The Roast Game Happened in America and Canada, and not the Turkey-or-Ham tradition.

I. Families lied about what they ate as the centerpiece of Christmas Dinner (In both The Roast Game and Post-Roast-Game eras respectively).

J. There is just no Christmas Dinner Data for America and likely Canada that we just can’t take with a grain of salt as well.

All of these 10 points solidly establishes and backs up this argument in favor of proving The-Post-Roast-Game Theory.